Talk:Conduit F3: Difference between revisions
From Destinypedia, the Destiny wiki
Shazamikaze (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
::On that note, where is the Conduit actually mentioned? Did a word search, nothing comes up. They use an image of a Conduit as an example of a fusion rifle (which has the info from the update in its article), but as far as I can tell, none of that info seems to pertain to the Conduit specifically.--[[User:Hawki|Hawki]] ([[User talk:Hawki|talk]]) 19:38, 19 May 2014 (EDT) | ::On that note, where is the Conduit actually mentioned? Did a word search, nothing comes up. They use an image of a Conduit as an example of a fusion rifle (which has the info from the update in its article), but as far as I can tell, none of that info seems to pertain to the Conduit specifically.--[[User:Hawki|Hawki]] ([[User talk:Hawki|talk]]) 19:38, 19 May 2014 (EDT) | ||
:::Does it matter? The Conduit F3 is a fusion rifle. What is the difference? --[[User:Xamikaze330|Xamikaze330]] ([[User talk:Xamikaze330|talk]]) 23:43, 19 May 2014 (EDT)Xamikaze330 | :::Does it matter? The Conduit F3 is a fusion rifle. What is the difference? --[[User:Xamikaze330|Xamikaze330]] ([[User talk:Xamikaze330|talk]]) 23:43, 19 May 2014 (EDT)Xamikaze330 | ||
::::To prevent needless repetition of info? To prevent blanket statements being automatically applied? It's not the only fusion rifle in the game after all. By the same logic, every time x (info) is stated about y (whatever weapon), the same info would have to be given to every version of y that exists. And that's a ''lot'' of weapons. Not to mention that it's making an assumption that there's no exception to blanket statements within the weapon type itself.--[[User:Hawki|Hawki]] ([[User talk:Hawki|talk]]) 02:02, 20 May 2014 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 01:02, May 20, 2014
More Content Needed
This page needs more content added from Bungie Weekly Update 05/16/2014, as it includes additional information about the Fusion Rifles and the Conduit F3. --Xamikaze330 (talk) 11:33, 19 May 2014 (EDT)Xamikaze330
- UPDATE: Okay, so I went ahead and added the new information myself, so it's the best I can do under the circumstances (no comment). If you think the info could be better phrased, then please by all means do so, and change it accordingly. --Xamikaze330 (talk) 15:04, 19 May 2014 (EDT)Xamikaze330
- On that note, where is the Conduit actually mentioned? Did a word search, nothing comes up. They use an image of a Conduit as an example of a fusion rifle (which has the info from the update in its article), but as far as I can tell, none of that info seems to pertain to the Conduit specifically.--Hawki (talk) 19:38, 19 May 2014 (EDT)
- Does it matter? The Conduit F3 is a fusion rifle. What is the difference? --Xamikaze330 (talk) 23:43, 19 May 2014 (EDT)Xamikaze330
- To prevent needless repetition of info? To prevent blanket statements being automatically applied? It's not the only fusion rifle in the game after all. By the same logic, every time x (info) is stated about y (whatever weapon), the same info would have to be given to every version of y that exists. And that's a lot of weapons. Not to mention that it's making an assumption that there's no exception to blanket statements within the weapon type itself.--Hawki (talk) 02:02, 20 May 2014 (EDT)
- Does it matter? The Conduit F3 is a fusion rifle. What is the difference? --Xamikaze330 (talk) 23:43, 19 May 2014 (EDT)Xamikaze330
- On that note, where is the Conduit actually mentioned? Did a word search, nothing comes up. They use an image of a Conduit as an example of a fusion rifle (which has the info from the update in its article), but as far as I can tell, none of that info seems to pertain to the Conduit specifically.--Hawki (talk) 19:38, 19 May 2014 (EDT)