Destinypedia:Code of Conduct: Difference between revisions

Line 39: Line 39:
Sometimes potentially controversial changes may be made to find out whether it is opposed and another editor may revert it. This may be the beginning of a revert-discuss cycle. While this is fine, an edit war may arise if the situation develops into a series of back-and-forth reverts. Such back and forthing is considered edit warring and undermines the article's stability. Nevertheless, not every revert or controversial edit is regarded as edit warring:
Sometimes potentially controversial changes may be made to find out whether it is opposed and another editor may revert it. This may be the beginning of a revert-discuss cycle. While this is fine, an edit war may arise if the situation develops into a series of back-and-forth reverts. Such back and forthing is considered edit warring and undermines the article's stability. Nevertheless, not every revert or controversial edit is regarded as edit warring:


*Reverting vandalism is not edit warring. However, edits from a slanted point of view, general insertion or removal of material, or other good-faith changes are not considered vandalism. See our Destinypedia article [[Destinypedia:About Vandalism|about Vandalism]] for specifics on what classifies as Vandalism.
*Reverting vandalism is not edit warring. However, edits from a slanted point of view, general insertion or removal of material, or other good-faith changes are not considered vandalism. See our Destinypedia article [[Destinypedia:Education Center for Vandalism|about Vandalism]] for specifics on what classifies as Vandalism.


*Reverting to enforce certain overriding policies is not considered edit warring.  
*Reverting to enforce certain overriding policies is not considered edit warring.