User:StanNPractice
From Destinypedia, the Destiny wiki
Edited the page
Titan (moon)
"New Pacific Arcology are part of these locations' HUD and on Deep Dives..."
Edited the page
Titan (moon)
"Not a part of New Pacific Arcology according to HUD gameplay."
Edited the page
Story
"/* Lightfall */"
You must be
logged in to post messages to other users
Or other admins for that matter
Do not message me with private messages.
A perspective from someone who wasn’t present during the final mission of act 2 to witness Maya converting Sol Collective frames into Precursor frames?
So long as that armor remains inaccessible in the API, Destinypedia cannot add it to the wiki or any of its information *until* as such it can be publically accessed. Our own lore database is for sourcing purposes. That is my verdict on the manner.
Is it stated anywhere that The Corrupted Puppeteer is female and thus is automatically identical to Atraks-1, Fallen Exo? The article doesn’t say yet, and if it is then there must be a source to back it.
Just because in-game models are similar to each other, or identical, says absolutely nothing if it’s canonical. We save that for theorycrafting and spinfoil on r/DestinyLore, r/RaidSecrets, or what have you.
Destinypedia does not jump the gun, or tries not to, on new content. Sorrow’s position is correct until new information is available. Don’t bother me with this again.
