Destinypedia talk:Manual of Style: Difference between revisions

From Destinypedia, the Destiny wiki

(Created page with "==About page titles== Currently we go by the policy of not including titles (emperor, commander, etc.) as part of the article name. Since ''Destiny'' has tons of enemies and c...")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
==About page titles==
==About page titles==
Currently we go by the policy of not including titles (emperor, commander, etc.) as part of the article name. Since ''Destiny'' has tons of enemies and characters that are given all these titles (especially enemy races), I propose we scrap the policy of not including titles. It will save us a lot of work of having to rename the vast amounts of articles that already use titles. Example of what I'm suggesting:
[[Destinypedia:Manual of Style#Page titles|Currently we go by the policy of not including titles]] (emperor, commander, etc.) as part of the article name. Since ''Destiny'' has tons of enemies and characters that are given all these titles (especially enemy races), I propose we scrap the policy of not including titles. It will save us a lot of work of having to rename the vast amounts of articles that already use titles. Example of what I'm suggesting:
*'''[[Zavala]]''' ---> '''Commander Zavala'''
*'''[[Zavala]]''' ---> '''Commander Zavala'''
*'''[[Calus]]''' ---> '''Emperor Calus'''
*'''[[Calus]]''' ---> '''Emperor Calus'''
*'''[[Oryx, the Taken King]]''' remains as is.
*'''[[Oryx, the Taken King]]''' remains as is.


TL;DR: the policy is already hardly followed so I propose we just scrap it.--{{User:Spartacus/Sig}} 13:13, 27 October 2017 (EDT)
TL;DR: the policy is already hardly followed so I propose we just scrap it.--{{User:Spartacus/Sig}} 13:15, 27 October 2017 (EDT)

Revision as of 12:15, October 27, 2017

About page titles

Currently we go by the policy of not including titles (emperor, commander, etc.) as part of the article name. Since Destiny has tons of enemies and characters that are given all these titles (especially enemy races), I propose we scrap the policy of not including titles. It will save us a lot of work of having to rename the vast amounts of articles that already use titles. Example of what I'm suggesting:

TL;DR: the policy is already hardly followed so I propose we just scrap it.--Spartacus TalkContribs 13:15, 27 October 2017 (EDT)