Talk:Destiny: Difference between revisions
From Destinypedia, the Destiny wiki
Shazamikaze (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
:::Darn it all, there is a lot of things missing from the Features section. It needs a weapons subsection too. --[[User:Xamikaze330|Xamikaze330]] ([[User talk:Xamikaze330|talk]]) 22:28, 11 July 2013 (EDT)Xamikaze330 | :::Darn it all, there is a lot of things missing from the Features section. It needs a weapons subsection too. --[[User:Xamikaze330|Xamikaze330]] ([[User talk:Xamikaze330|talk]]) 22:28, 11 July 2013 (EDT)Xamikaze330 | ||
::::Added weapon section. Would anyone be opposed to me removing the <nowiki>{{1st}}</nowiki> templates from the page? They seem redundant to me, as ''everything'' is a first appearance. --{{User:TentacleTornado/Sig}} 05:57, 12 July 2013 (EDT) | ::::Added weapon section. Would anyone be opposed to me removing the <nowiki>{{1st}}</nowiki> templates from the page? They seem redundant to me, as ''everything'' is a first appearance. --{{User:TentacleTornado/Sig}} 05:57, 12 July 2013 (EDT) | ||
:''(reset indent)'' Me personally, I don't really care. I mean, you do have a point about everything being a first appearance, but it really all depends. Don't ask me about the last part, as I have no idea. --[[User:Xamikaze330|Xamikaze330]] ([[User talk:Xamikaze330|talk]]) 11:52, 12 July 2013 (EDT)Xamikaze330 | |||
Revision as of 10:52, July 12, 2013
Can someone please tell me what TBA and TBD mean? Pokebub (talk) 12:38, 28 April 2013 (EDT)
- "To Be Annouced" and "To Be Determined/Decided", I think. :) --TentacleTornado 13:36, 28 April 2013 (EDT)
- ok thx. Pokebub (talk)
Gallery
... I probably didn't have to put in all of those pictures, did I. Always use the DMR. This is craZboy557, signing off. 06:55, 30 April 2013 (EDT)
Features Section
Hey, shouldn't there be a Vehicles subsection in the article too? --Xamikaze330 (talk) 18:31, 10 July 2013 (EDT)Xamikaze330
- oh yeah... Always use the DMR. This is craZboy557, signing off. 19:12, 10 July 2013 (EDT)
- Oh, yeah baby, much better now! :-) --Xamikaze330 (talk) 20:24, 10 July 2013 (EDT)Xamikaze330
- Darn it all, there is a lot of things missing from the Features section. It needs a weapons subsection too. --Xamikaze330 (talk) 22:28, 11 July 2013 (EDT)Xamikaze330
- Oh, yeah baby, much better now! :-) --Xamikaze330 (talk) 20:24, 10 July 2013 (EDT)Xamikaze330
- (reset indent) Me personally, I don't really care. I mean, you do have a point about everything being a first appearance, but it really all depends. Don't ask me about the last part, as I have no idea. --Xamikaze330 (talk) 11:52, 12 July 2013 (EDT)Xamikaze330