Destinypedia talk:Featured/Article: Difference between revisions
From Destinypedia, the Destiny wiki
Tag: Mobile edit |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:::Rules say three admin votes is enough to get things kicking. Until Destiny 2, we can nominate articles and get things on the move. Doing that program will also help us finalize alot of articles as well so there is an upside to consider. [[User:Arcmind|Arcmind]] ([[User talk:Arcmind|talk]]) 07:54, 7 November 2016 (EST) | :::Rules say three admin votes is enough to get things kicking. Until Destiny 2, we can nominate articles and get things on the move. Doing that program will also help us finalize alot of articles as well so there is an upside to consider. [[User:Arcmind|Arcmind]] ([[User talk:Arcmind|talk]]) 07:54, 7 November 2016 (EST) | ||
::::As per Arcmind, I don't think there's a need to wait. There's already a few articles that could be nominated. Like he said, it would also get things moving.--{{User:Spartacus/Sig}} 11:06, 7 November 2016 (EST) | ::::As per Arcmind, I don't think there's a need to wait. There's already a few articles that could be nominated. Like he said, it would also get things moving.--{{User:Spartacus/Sig}} 11:06, 7 November 2016 (EST) | ||
:::::When you put it that way, you make perfect sense. All right then. Let's do this. --[[User:Dante the Ghost|Dante the Ghost]] ([[User talk:Dante the Ghost|talk]]) 11:13, 7 November 2016 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 11:13, November 7, 2016
Nominations
I believe we can start taking nominations for featured articles. We already have the requirements written out. Before we start, I'd like to ask if anyone feels like we need to alter the requirements (they were essentially copied from Halopedia), or if they're fine the way they are?--Spartacus Talk • Contribs 19:18, 6 November 2016 (EST)
- I personally vouch for leaving it the way it is. Halopedia has been around longer, and has already been tested and proven. If changes need to be made later, then so be it, but for the time being they are perfect in my opinion. Arcmind (talk) 19:25, 6 November 2016 (EST)
- The requirements sound good as it is, but I think we should wait until Destiny 2 or a content drop post Rise of Iron before we do the nomination. We do have many articles that can be vouched for, but we don't have enough users to carry through the nomination. --Dante the Ghost (talk) 21:04, 6 November 2016 (EST)
- Rules say three admin votes is enough to get things kicking. Until Destiny 2, we can nominate articles and get things on the move. Doing that program will also help us finalize alot of articles as well so there is an upside to consider. Arcmind (talk) 07:54, 7 November 2016 (EST)
- As per Arcmind, I don't think there's a need to wait. There's already a few articles that could be nominated. Like he said, it would also get things moving.--Spartacus Talk • Contribs 11:06, 7 November 2016 (EST)
- When you put it that way, you make perfect sense. All right then. Let's do this. --Dante the Ghost (talk) 11:13, 7 November 2016 (EST)
- As per Arcmind, I don't think there's a need to wait. There's already a few articles that could be nominated. Like he said, it would also get things moving.--Spartacus Talk • Contribs 11:06, 7 November 2016 (EST)
- Rules say three admin votes is enough to get things kicking. Until Destiny 2, we can nominate articles and get things on the move. Doing that program will also help us finalize alot of articles as well so there is an upside to consider. Arcmind (talk) 07:54, 7 November 2016 (EST)
- The requirements sound good as it is, but I think we should wait until Destiny 2 or a content drop post Rise of Iron before we do the nomination. We do have many articles that can be vouched for, but we don't have enough users to carry through the nomination. --Dante the Ghost (talk) 21:04, 6 November 2016 (EST)