11,775
edits
Talk:Atraks-1, Fallen Exo: Difference between revisions
→Atraks-Corrupted Puppeteer explanation
(→Atraks-Corrupted Puppeteer explanation: new section) Tag: Mobile edit |
Tag: Mobile edit |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
For the sake of editors like me attempting to reconcile the whole discussion/dispute of Atraks-1 being [[The Corrupted Puppeteer]], I figured we are owed a deep dive explaining the rationale why this wikia cannot recognize it. If not, this will only lead to confusion on part of newer editors. | For the sake of editors like me attempting to reconcile the whole discussion/dispute of Atraks-1 being [[The Corrupted Puppeteer]], I figured we are owed a deep dive explaining the rationale why this wikia cannot recognize it. If not, this will only lead to confusion on part of newer editors. | ||
[[User:StanNPractice|StanNPractice]] ([[User talk:StanNPractice|talk]]) 13:39, October 17, 2024 (EDT) | [[User:StanNPractice|StanNPractice]] ([[User talk:StanNPractice|talk]]) 13:39, October 17, 2024 (EDT) | ||
:# Just because they share the same in-game model is not implicit or even explicit evidence they are the same character. It’s Bungie reusing assets. Destinypedia has long since known about these oversights or inconsistencies since before I joined this wiki. | |||
:# [[Destinypedia:What_Destinypedia_is_not#Destinypedia_is_not_a_speculative_forum|Destinypedia is not a speculative forum]]. We are not in the business of speculation; we only record what we see. Mentioning that The Corrupted Puppeteer shares a model with [[Atraks-1, Fallen Exo]] is okay; trying to use that as justification they are the same character or that one is inspired by the other is against Destinypedia’s rules. | |||
:# We have forums, including [[Forum:Fan Fiction]], where you can write your own fanfic about this and that regarding Destiny. They exist precisely for this reason. Leave it out of mainspace articles. —{{User:Dante the Ghost/Sig}} 14:07, October 17, 2024 (EDT) | |||