Talk:The Taken King: Difference between revisions
From Destinypedia, the Destiny wiki
No edit summary |
m (Talk:The Taken King) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:IMO if they have the exact same name, I'd put them on the same page, especially considering that with the exotic blueprints you can automatically upgrade year 1 to year 2.[[User:OmgHAX!|OmgHAX!]] ([[User talk:OmgHAX!|talk]]) 08:50, 20 August 2015 (EDT) | :IMO if they have the exact same name, I'd put them on the same page, especially considering that with the exotic blueprints you can automatically upgrade year 1 to year 2.[[User:OmgHAX!|OmgHAX!]] ([[User talk:OmgHAX!|talk]]) 08:50, 20 August 2015 (EDT) | ||
== Is the Taken King a Hive Expansion? == | |||
Besides the Taken introduced, wouldn't the Taken King expansion be considered a Hive expansion because it revolves around Oryx, the God-King of the Hive? [[User:Titan66|Titan66]] ([[User Talk:Titan66|talk]]) 12:35, 23 May 2016 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 11:39, May 23, 2016
PlayStation exclusive content
Sector 618 is a PlayStation exclusive
Masterchief46517 (talk) 03:22, 17 June 2015 (EDT)
Pages for "Improved" old exotics
So how will we deal with these? The TTK variant of the SUROS Regime has the same name, model, and stats (not including Attack) as the old SUROS Regime, but with a new paintjob and perks. This will probably be the same for other TTK "remastered" exotics. Should we make separate pages for these variants, like SUROS Regime (The Taken King), or lump them into the existing pages? MorningWalker (talk) 01:07, 20 August 2015 (EDT)
- IMO if they have the exact same name, I'd put them on the same page, especially considering that with the exotic blueprints you can automatically upgrade year 1 to year 2.OmgHAX! (talk) 08:50, 20 August 2015 (EDT)
Is the Taken King a Hive Expansion?
Besides the Taken introduced, wouldn't the Taken King expansion be considered a Hive expansion because it revolves around Oryx, the God-King of the Hive? Titan66 (talk) 12:35, 23 May 2016 (EDT)