Editing Destinypedia talk:Featured/Article
From Destinypedia, the Destiny wiki
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:I personally vouch for leaving it the way it is. Halopedia has been around longer, and has already been tested and proven. If changes need to be made later, then so be it, but for the time being they are perfect in my opinion. [[User:Arcmind|Arcmind]] ([[User talk:Arcmind|talk]]) 19:25, 6 November 2016 (EST) | :I personally vouch for leaving it the way it is. Halopedia has been around longer, and has already been tested and proven. If changes need to be made later, then so be it, but for the time being they are perfect in my opinion. [[User:Arcmind|Arcmind]] ([[User talk:Arcmind|talk]]) 19:25, 6 November 2016 (EST) | ||
::The requirements sound good as it is, but I think we should wait until Destiny 2 or a content drop post ''Rise of Iron'' before we do the nomination. We do have many articles that can be vouched for, but we don't have enough users to carry through the nomination. --[[User:Dante the Ghost|Dante the Ghost]] ([[User talk:Dante the Ghost|talk]]) 21:04, 6 November 2016 (EST) | ::The requirements sound good as it is, but I think we should wait until Destiny 2 or a content drop post ''Rise of Iron'' before we do the nomination. We do have many articles that can be vouched for, but we don't have enough users to carry through the nomination. --[[User:Dante the Ghost|Dante the Ghost]] ([[User talk:Dante the Ghost|talk]]) 21:04, 6 November 2016 (EST) | ||
:Rules say three admin votes is enough to get things kicking. Until Destiny 2, we can nominate articles and get things on the move. Doing that program will also help us finalize alot of articles as well so there is an upside to consider. [[User:Arcmind|Arcmind]] ([[User talk:Arcmind|talk]]) 07:54, 7 November 2016 (EST) | |||